AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 61% better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
13.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 1689
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.32 vs 4.636
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 201.006 vs 115.549
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 0.454
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.26 vs 7.024
8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 10.485
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1162
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1695
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2297

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 May 2016 vs 1 June 2012
Texture fill rate	16.46 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	526.8 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	22612 vs 1689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.32 vs 4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	201.006 vs 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.227 vs 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.26 vs 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	85.46 vs 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1979 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2101 vs 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2297

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

4.3x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 200 MHz
34.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 33.5
50x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 33.9
38.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2297 vs 60

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 200 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162 vs 33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695 vs 33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2297 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

22612

1689

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.32

4.636

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

201.006

115.549

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.227

0.454

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.26

7.024

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

85.46

10.485

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1979

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2101

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2297

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.5

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.9

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

Name	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	22612	1689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.32	4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	201.006	115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.227	0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.26	7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	85.46	10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1979	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2101	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33.5	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	33.9	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	60	2297
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1457
PassMark - G3D Mark		783
PassMark - G2D Mark		250

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Code name	Wani	GK107
Launch date	31 May 2016	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1466	1398
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$119.90
Price now		$149.90
Value for money (0-100)		6.18
Technical info
Boost clock speed	758 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	526.8 gflops	326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	16.46 GTexel / s	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Shared memory		0