AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 997 vs 528
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5979 vs 1185
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1684
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 3070
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1684
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 3070
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 23 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 vs 528 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5979 vs 1185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 vs 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 vs 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 3070 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 168
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 vs 168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | 528 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 245 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5979 | 1185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 3070 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Opal | Pinewood |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 23 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1202 | 1076 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 627 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
IntelUHD Graphics
