AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
- 53.8x better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 997 vs 213
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1039
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 vs 213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 49.5x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | 213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 1039 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260X | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | Opal | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1200 | 687 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 850 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |