AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1668
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 997
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 168
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 5979
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1893
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3158
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1893
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 997 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 168 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 vs 5979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 vs 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 vs 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | 1978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5979 | 8750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Skylake GT4e |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1202 | 993 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
IntelUHD Graphics
