AMD Radeon R7 M460 vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M460 and Intel Iris Graphics 6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 898
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 vs 3028
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1767 vs 1139
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1767 vs 1139
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 5 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 898 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 vs 3028 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 vs 1139 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 207
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2772
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2772
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M460
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 898 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | 3028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M460 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Meso | Broadwell GT3 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1220 | 1074 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 189 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |