AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 8219
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 8219
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 43046
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 26 March 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 750 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 8219 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 43046 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 163.7 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 5,238 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9143 vs 6316
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9143 vs 6316
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 27566
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 27566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9143 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9143 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 27566 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6316 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6316 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 | 32085 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 | 43046 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 106.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1878.403 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.751 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 26 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 165 | 190 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 5,238 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2816 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP with others
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
