AMD Radeon R9 290 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 16.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8314 vs 516
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 636
- 95.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 1071
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2461
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 947 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8314 vs 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 275 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 290 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8314 | 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | 1071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2461 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3684 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 290 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 348 | 615 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 947 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |