AMD Radeon R9 370 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 8.1x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 7.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 628
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Trinidad | R600 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 407 | 379 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |