AMD Radeon R9 370X vs AMD FirePro W7000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 52.467
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.886
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 85.472
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 268.49
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6475
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 6475
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 13 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2,432 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 85.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 268.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 6475 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1148.367 vs 1139.703
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 vs 1139.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 52.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1148.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 85.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 268.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4270 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $899 |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 495 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 242 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |