AMD Radeon R9 370X vs AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon HD 8830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 2695
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 2695
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 2695 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8830M
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5106 vs 3704
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11302 vs 3348
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5106 vs 3704
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11302 vs 3348
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon HD 8830M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 11302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 11302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Venus |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 434 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 575 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |