AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 970 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 138.6x more memory clock speed: 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 635
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3342
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 7 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz vs 928 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 6224
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9685
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9685
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3333 vs 3053
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 3,973 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 vs 6224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 9685 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3333 vs 3053 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6224 | 9517 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | 635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 3333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Antigua | GK110B |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 7 November 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 313 | 398 |
| Price now | $528.44 | $749.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | 14.80 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 5,345 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 210 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 336 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with others
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp
