AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs AMD FirePro W4190M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and AMD FirePro W4190M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1713x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 180
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2015 vs 12 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 180 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1148 vs 1024
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1148 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | AMD FirePro W4190M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 180 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 1148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | AMD FirePro W4190M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | Opal |
Launch date | 2015 | 12 November 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 632 | 1066 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |