AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 20 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 19473.7x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 1.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 950 MHz
- 17.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1024 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2015 vs 23 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 1.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 950 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 vs 59 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 232
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 274 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 59 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Venus | NV38 A1 |
Launch date | 2015 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 632 | 609 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 1.9 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 135 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0a |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 30.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 950 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |