AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 842.8x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
Launch date | 2015 vs 7 December 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 69% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 232
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3927 vs 1024
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 232 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3927 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 476 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 3927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13564 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Venus | GF110 |
Launch date | 2015 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 631 | 712 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |