AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Launch date | 2015 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 232
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2806 vs 1024
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 232 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 241 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 2806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Venus | GP107 |
Launch date | 2015 | 10 Feb 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 632 | 680 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | 1.879 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 3300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |