AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 842.4x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Launch date 2015 vs 3 December 2015
Texture fill rate 37.00 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 232
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3462 vs 1024
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1098 MHz vs 925 MHz
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 339 vs 232
PassMark - G3D Mark 3462 vs 1024

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
339
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1024
3462
Name AMD Radeon R9 A375 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 339
PassMark - G3D Mark 1024 3462
Geekbench - OpenCL 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.268
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 A375 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell
Code name Venus GM107
Launch date 2015 3 December 2015
Place in performance rating 631 698
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 925 MHz 1098 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 900 MHz 1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1184 GFLOPS
Pipelines 640 640
Pixel fill rate 14.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 37.00 GTexel/s 43.92 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1500 million 1,870 million
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5.1 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus