AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X and ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 37.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 137
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 507
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 24 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 507 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | 137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | 507 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | R500 |
Code name | Amethyst | R580 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 24 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 488 | 293 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 384 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | Not Listed | 9.0c |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 46.4 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |