AMD Radeon R9 M485X vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M485X and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 6.8x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 192
- 9.1x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3661 vs 641
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 vs 641 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 417
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | 441 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 | 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M485X | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | GK208 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 272 | 830 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 846 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1270 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Enduro | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |