AMD Radeon RX 480 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 480 and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 38x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 28.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 169.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8632 vs 51
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 June 2016 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 80 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8632 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 16.6x better floating-point performance: 96 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 480 | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8632 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 480 | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Ellesmere | RV620 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 29 June 2016 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 340 | 322 |
| Price now | $299.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | 96 gflops |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 80 |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x VHDCI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 480 with others
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
AMDRadeon E8870
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
