AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300 and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1327 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 1564.7x more texture fill rate: 144.8 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 417
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7627 vs 3661
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1327 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 144.8 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7627 vs 3661 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7627 | 3661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39363 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 28 May 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Place in performance rating | 152 | 272 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1327 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 289.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.265 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.632 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.64 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 144.8 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Enduro |