AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD FirePro S10000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 60.4x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 7867
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 7867
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34981 vs 30631
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3621
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3621
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 7867 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34981 vs 30631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 367
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4768 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4768 vs 4307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD FirePro S10000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 7867 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34981 | 30631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 502 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 4768 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 383 | 435 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 950 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 305 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 480 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |