AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD FirePro S10000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 60.4x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 750 Watt
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 7867
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 7867
  • Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34981 vs 30631
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3621
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3621
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3321
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3321
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 12 November 2012
Core clock speed 1036 MHz vs 825 MHz
Boost clock speed 1445 MHz vs 950 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 750 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 vs 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 vs 7867
Geekbench - OpenCL 34981 vs 30631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 vs 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 vs 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000

  • 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 367
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4768 vs 4307
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 4096 vs 1408
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 502 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark 4768 vs 4307

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
7867
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
34981
30631
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
367
502
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4307
4768
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3321
Name AMD Radeon RX 5300M AMD FirePro S10000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 7867
Geekbench - OpenCL 34981 30631
PassMark - G2D Mark 367 502
PassMark - G3D Mark 4307 4768
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 73.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.978

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5300M AMD FirePro S10000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Navi 14 Tahiti
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 12 November 2012
Place in performance rating 383 435
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,599

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1445 MHz 950 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1036 MHz 825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 4096
Pixel fill rate 46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 750 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 2x 3,405 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
HDMI
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 305 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 168.0 GB/s 480 GB / s
Memory bus width 96 Bit 2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5