AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD FirePro W7100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD FirePro W7100

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 920 MHz
1235x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
4.7x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 400 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 6362
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 6362
Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35118 vs 24858

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 12 August 2014
Core clock speed	1036 MHz vs 920 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 400 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813 vs 6362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813 vs 6362
Geekbench - OpenCL	35118 vs 24858

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100

Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 367
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5314 vs 4307

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	683 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark	5314 vs 4307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

6362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

6362

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35118

24858

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

683

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4307

5314

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3355

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD FirePro W7100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	6362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	6362
Geekbench - OpenCL	35118	24858
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	683
PassMark - G3D Mark	4307	5314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		65.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1248.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		94.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		361.58

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD FirePro W7100
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Navi 14	Tonga
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	12 August 2014
Place in performance rating	383	438
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	920 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	1792
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	103.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	400 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,000 million
Floating-point performance		3,297 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
HDMI
DisplayPort count		4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5