AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 127.2 GTexel/s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 9813
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 9813
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 34981
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 367
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 127.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 9813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 9813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 vs 34981 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 4307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 16149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34981 | 99542 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 768 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 15475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2813 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.1 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Vega 20 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | Dec 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 383 | 166 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1720 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1408 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 110.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 440.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 475 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 13230 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |