AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 918 MHz
  • 1237.4x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 6474
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 6474
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3043
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3043
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2782
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2782
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 2 September 2014
Core clock speed 1036 MHz vs 918 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 vs 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 vs 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2782

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

  • Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 367
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 4307
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1792 vs 1408
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark 6680 vs 4307

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
6474
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
367
597
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4307
6680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
2782
Name AMD Radeon RX 5300M AMD Radeon R9 285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 6474
Geekbench - OpenCL 34981
PassMark - G2D Mark 367 597
PassMark - G3D Mark 4307 6680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 2782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 71.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 390.891
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2778

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5300M AMD Radeon R9 285

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Navi 14 Tonga
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 2 September 2014
Place in performance rating 383 448
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $249

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1445 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1036 MHz 918 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 1792
Pixel fill rate 46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s 102.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 190 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 5,000 million
Floating-point performance 3,290 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin
Length 221 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 168.0 GB/s 176.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 96 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 5500 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)