AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 918 MHz
- 1237.4x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 6474
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 6474
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3043
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3043
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2782
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 2 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 918 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2782 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 367
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 4307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 6474 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34981 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 597 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 6680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 390.891 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tonga |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 2 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 383 | 448 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 918 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 102.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 176.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |