AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 290

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 947 MHz
839.6x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
3.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 6300
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 6300

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed	1036 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813 vs 6300

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 35118
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 367
Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8314 vs 4307

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	102277 vs 35118
PassMark - G2D Mark	775 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark	8314 vs 4307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

6300

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35118

102277

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

775

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4307

8314

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3354

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	6300
Geekbench - OpenCL	35118	102277
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	775
PassMark - G3D Mark	4307	8314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		540.645
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3684

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 290
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	Hawaii
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	5 November 2013
Place in performance rating	383	348
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	2560
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	151.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,849 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)