AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 14 March 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 9813
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 9813
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57151 vs 35118
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 367
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 4307
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 9813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 9813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 vs 35118 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 367 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11691 vs 4307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 14998 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 57151 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 782 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 11691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 383 | 240 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8004 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
IntelArc A370M
