AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 594.7x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 21 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- 2.2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1408
- 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13738 vs 9813
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13738 vs 9813
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37354 vs 35118
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 vs 367
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11792 vs 4307
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3695
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13738 vs 9813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13738 vs 9813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37354 vs 35118 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11792 vs 4307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 13738 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 37354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 737 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 11792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.895 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM200 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 383 | 242 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
Price now | $2,825 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |