AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 7.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 127.2 GTexel/s
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 9813
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 9813
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41715 vs 35118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 127.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 9813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 9813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41715 vs 35118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 15910 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 41715 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 383 | 291 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1569 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1316 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 279.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | 139.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | 8.940 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 111.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 279.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | Large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 230.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
IntelArc A370M
