AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Tesla P40

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 346.2x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9538
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9538
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 13 September 2016
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 vs 9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 vs 9538
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40

  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1036 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1445 MHz
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1408
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53285 vs 35118
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 450 vs 367
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12678 vs 4307
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 1036 MHz
Boost clock speed 1531 MHz vs 1445 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 1408
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 53285 vs 35118
PassMark - G2D Mark 450 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark 12678 vs 4307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3699 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3699 vs 3695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
9538
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
35118
53285
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
367
450
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4307
12678
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
Name AMD Radeon RX 5300M NVIDIA Tesla P40
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 9538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 9538
Geekbench - OpenCL 35118 53285
PassMark - G2D Mark 367 450
PassMark - G3D Mark 4307 12678
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 300.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3559.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 19.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 204.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1214.142

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5300M NVIDIA Tesla P40

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Pascal
Code name Navi 14 GP102
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 13 September 2016
Place in performance rating 383 230
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $5,699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1445 MHz 1531 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1036 MHz 1303 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 3840
Pixel fill rate 46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s 367.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 11,758 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 168.0 GB/s 480.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 96 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 10008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5X