AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 M470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3383.3x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9167 vs 2331
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 307
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 1674
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9167 vs 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 44830
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 44830 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9167 | 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44830 | 47924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Strato |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 768 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 |