AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8243.7x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- 4.9x more pipelines: 1408 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 11.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9164 vs 1953
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 413
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 1112
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 1112
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 288 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9164 vs 1953 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 vs 413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9164 | 1953 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44850 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 1112 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4889 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 14 | GF104 |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 288 | 899 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 288 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 19.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 1,950 million |
Floating-point performance | 616.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 60.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |