AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs AMD FirePro W7100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 920 MHz
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 162.36 GT/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8803 vs 5314
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 683
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42314 vs 24858
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 6362
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 6362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 12 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 920 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 vs 5314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 683 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 vs 24858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD FirePro W7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 | 5314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 683 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 | 24858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 12 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 257 | 438 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | Tonga | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 920 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 103.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |