AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 8673
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 8673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 8673 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 268.8 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10015 vs 8801
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 vs 766
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3717
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 4813
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 268.8 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10015 vs 8801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 843 vs 766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 4813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8801 | 10015 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 843 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42284 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 5170 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 257 | 218 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | Fiji | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 191 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |