AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 603
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 8803
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44918 vs 42314
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 12069
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 12069
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5530 vs 4813
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 8803 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 vs 42314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 12069 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5530 vs 4813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 | 44918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 5530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 257 | 312 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Code name | GP104B | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan |