AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42314 vs 40196
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 9834
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 9834
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 17 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 vs 40196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 9834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 9834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 162.36 GT/s
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 8803
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 766
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5223 vs 4813
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec vs 162.36 GT/s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13048 vs 8803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 766 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5223 vs 4813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 | 13048 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 | 40196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 9834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 9834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 5223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Maxwell 2.0 |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 17 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 257 | 314 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | GM200 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 192 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |