AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1075 MHz
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42314 vs 40196
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 9834
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 9834
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1845 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 42314 vs 40196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12069 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12069 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

  • Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 162.36 GT/s
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 8803
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 766
  • Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5223 vs 4813
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 192 billion / sec vs 162.36 GT/s
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13048 vs 8803
PassMark - G2D Mark 847 vs 766
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5223 vs 4813

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8803
13048
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
766
847
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
42314
40196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12069
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12069
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4813
5223
Name AMD Radeon RX 5500 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark 8803 13048
PassMark - G2D Mark 766 847
Geekbench - OpenCL 42314 40196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12069 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12069 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4813 5223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 518.554

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5500 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Maxwell 2.0
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 17 March 2015
Place in performance rating 257 314
Type Desktop Desktop
Code name GM200
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $1,999.99
Value for money (0-100) 7.38

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1845 MHz 1075 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1670 MHz 1000 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.4 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.2 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 59 GP/s
Stream Processors 1408
Texture fill rate 162.36 GT/s 192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 8,000 million
CUDA cores 3072
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm
Pipelines 3072

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin 6-pin + 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options 4x

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5