AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD Radeon Pro 575 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 1096 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 140.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38633 vs 34944
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9613
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3617 vs 2814
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9613
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3617 vs 2814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 5 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 1096 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38633 vs 34944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 vs 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 vs 2814 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38633 | 34944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 9613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 2814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 4.0 |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 390 | 486 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 140.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
