AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 6300
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 6300
  • Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 3684
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed 1448 MHz vs 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 vs 6300
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223 vs 3684

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

  • Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 144.76 GT/s
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8314 vs 3166
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 336
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 38633
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3617
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3617
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 151.5 GTexel / s vs 144.76 GT/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8314 vs 3166
PassMark - G2D Mark 775 vs 336
Geekbench - OpenCL 102277 vs 38633
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3345

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3166
8314
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
775
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38633
102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4223
3684
Name AMD Radeon RX 5500M AMD Radeon R9 290
PassMark - G3D Mark 3166 8314
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 775
Geekbench - OpenCL 38633 102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3617 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3617 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223 3684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 540.645

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5500M AMD Radeon R9 290

Essentials

Architecture RDNA GCN 2.0
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 5 November 2013
Place in performance rating 390 348
Type Laptop Desktop
Code name Hawaii
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1645 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1448 MHz 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 9.26 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.63 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 52.6 GP/s
Stream Processors 1408
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s 151.5 GTexel / s
Transistor count 6400 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,849 gflops
Pipelines 2560
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 275 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 275 mm

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 512 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA

API support

DirectX 12
OpenGL 4.6
Vulkan