AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 12.3x more texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 18.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3166 vs 169
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 80
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1731
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1731
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 10 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 738 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 vs 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 80 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 3617
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 3617
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 3617 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 80 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 1731 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Tesla |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 10 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 390 | 652 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Code name | G96C | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 314 million |
| Floating-point performance | 117.5 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 16.13 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
