AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 902 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38654 vs 22920
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1448 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed 1645 MHz vs 902 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38654 vs 22920

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

  • Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 144.76 GT/s
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8059 vs 3166
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 336
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 11058
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3617
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 11058
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3617
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 216.5 GTexel / s vs 144.76 GT/s
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8059 vs 3166
PassMark - G2D Mark 543 vs 336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12657 vs 11058
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3711 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12657 vs 11058
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3711 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3345

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3166
8059
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
543
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38654
22920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3356
Name AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 3166 8059
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 543
Geekbench - OpenCL 38654 22920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3617 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3617 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 355.166

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Kepler
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 390 361
Type Laptop Workstation
Code name GK110B
Launch price (MSRP) $5,265
Price now $833.98
Value for money (0-100) 11.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1645 MHz 902 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1448 MHz 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 9.26 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.63 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 52.6 GP/s
Stream Processors 1408
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s 216.5 GTexel / s
Transistor count 6400 million 7,080 million
Floating-point performance 5,196 gflops
Pipelines 2880
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin 2x 6-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6
Vulkan