AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1051 MHz
  • Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38654 vs 22089
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9399
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9399
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed 1448 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed 1645 MHz vs 1051 MHz
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38654 vs 22089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6926 vs 3166
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 336
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3617
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3617
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6926 vs 3166
PassMark - G2D Mark 478 vs 336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685 vs 3617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3166
6926
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
478
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38654
22089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3339
Name AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3166 6926
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 478
Geekbench - OpenCL 38654 22089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3617 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3617 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 366.321

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Maxwell 2.0
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 18 August 2015
Place in performance rating 390 448
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Code name GM204

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1645 MHz 1051 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1448 MHz 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 9.26 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.63 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 52.6 GP/s
Stream Processors 1408
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s 93.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 6400 million 5,200 million
Floating-point performance 2,995 gflops
Pipelines 1,536
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin None
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.2

API support

DirectX 12
OpenGL 4.5
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan