AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 649.9x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13688 vs 12984
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 881 vs 805
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 142.691
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 1729.558
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 12.693
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 111.376
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 vs 13339
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13688 vs 12984 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 vs 805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 111.376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71540 vs 64852
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 1111.648
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71540 vs 64852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 vs 1111.648 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13688 | 12984 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 | 805 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64852 | 71540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 111.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1396.172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7710 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 193 | 227 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |