AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 2427.1x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13688 vs 3597
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 881 vs 435
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64853 vs 22044
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 64.199
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 1284.053
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 5.881
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 78.169
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 312.822
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 vs 6508
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 vs 6508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13688 vs 3597 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 vs 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64853 vs 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 78.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 vs 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3719
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3358
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3719
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13688 | 3597 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 | 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64853 | 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 78.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 24690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 24690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7710 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 XLE | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 303 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
IntelArc A530M
