AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 705
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 224.6 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 13700
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 13621
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 13621
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 224.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 13700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 13621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13700 | 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64880 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 201.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1018.396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7714 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | TU104 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 196 | 176 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | 296.6 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | 18.98 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |