AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60737 vs 26818
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 558
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11959 vs 5300
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14115 vs 8311
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14115 vs 8311
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 1842
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 1842
- 11.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 1663
- 11.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 vs 26818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 558 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 vs 5300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 1663 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | 26818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 558 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 | 5300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 1663 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 14 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 125 | 472 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |