AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 487
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11959 vs 10201
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 8054
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 8054
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 vs 10201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 8054 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 14115
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 14115
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 7991
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 7991
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 7991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 7991 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 | 10201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 8054 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 125 | 117 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700S
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
