AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 1025 MHz
- 3044.2x more texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60737 vs 16429
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 382
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11959 vs 4292
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14115 vs 6337
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14115 vs 6337
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 3715
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 3715
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 3358
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 1025 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 65.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 vs 16429 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 382 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 vs 4292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 vs 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 vs 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | 16429 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 382 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 | 4292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | GM206 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 125 | 469 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1025 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 65.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 2,940 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |