AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 3373.3x more texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60737 vs 15667
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 602
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11959 vs 4451
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14115 vs 6796
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14115 vs 6796
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 3702
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 3702
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 3348
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 3348
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 vs 15667 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 602 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 vs 4451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | 15667 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 602 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 | 4451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP107 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 125 | 523 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |