AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1538.9x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8669 vs 7895
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 492 vs 413
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57191 vs 27871
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3712
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3359
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3712
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3359
- Around 78% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8669 vs 7895 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 vs 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57191 vs 27871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 11117
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8669 | 7895 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57191 | 27871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 | 3316 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP106 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 367 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 4,400 million |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |