AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 902x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 1500x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57141 vs 44835
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3691
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3340
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3691
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 10 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57141 vs 44835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13510 vs 8609
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 493
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11117
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11117
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6070 vs 5982
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13510 vs 8609 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 vs 493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 11117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6070 vs 5982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 13510 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57141 | 44835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5982 | 6070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 10 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 278 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |