AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 865.1x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 1500x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57142 vs 44905
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3691
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3340
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3691
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3340
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5902 vs 5530
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57142 vs 44905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5902 vs 5530 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 8652
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 492
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11117
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 8652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8652 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57142 | 44905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5902 | 5530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104B |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 312 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |